The Differences on the Information Commitments toward Online Medical Information between People in the Hospital and General Public

Authors

  • Hung-Yuan WANG Graduate Institute of Applied Science and Technology, Taiwan Author
  • Jyh-Chong LIANG Graduate Institute of Applied Science and Technology, Taiwan Author
  • Szu-Hsien WU Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan, Department of Surgery, National Yang-Ming University Hospital, Taiwan, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taiwan Author

Abstract

The purpose of present study is to explore peoples’ online medical information commitments (MIC) and to compare peoples’ online MIC between different groups. A Medical Information Commitment Survey (MICS) was employed to investigate peoples’ evaluative standards of assessing online medical information and their searching strategies used on Internet. Two groups, including 247 samples from the group of people in hospital and 293 samples from the group of people in general public, were surveyed. The results showed that the MICS was a sufficiently reliable tool to assess peoples’ MIC. It was also found that for seeking more credible online medical information, people would tend to employ both basic and sophisticated evaluative standards (i.e. mixed standards) for judging online medical information, and to utilize “elaboration,” the advanced searching strategy, as well. Especially for people in hospital, they showed higher tendencies to use mixed standards and “elaboration” searching strategy than people in general public.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2011-11-28

How to Cite

The Differences on the Information Commitments toward Online Medical Information between People in the Hospital and General Public. (2011). International Conference on Computers in Education. https://library.apsce.net/index.php/ICCE/article/view/2749