Design Thinking 2.0 for Curriculum Design and Development

Authors

  • Adi TEDJASAPUTRA Customer Experience Insight Pty Ltd, Australia Author
  • Eunice SARI UX Indonesia and Charles Darwin University, Indonesia and Australia Author

Abstract

This paper describes several identified gaps in Backward Design and how Design Thinking 2.0 may bridge the gaps. Never intended to be a silver bullet, Design Thinking 2.0 is a promising alternative to Backward Design that still requires further validation from more case studies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2020-11-23

How to Cite

Design Thinking 2.0 for Curriculum Design and Development. (2020). International Conference on Computers in Education. https://library.apsce.net/index.php/ICCE/article/view/4002