Design Thinking 2.0 for Curriculum Design and Development
Abstract
This paper describes several identified gaps in Backward Design and how Design Thinking 2.0 may bridge the gaps. Never intended to be a silver bullet, Design Thinking 2.0 is a promising alternative to Backward Design that still requires further validation from more case studies.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2020-11-23
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
Articles
How to Cite
Design Thinking 2.0 for Curriculum Design and Development. (2020). International Conference on Computers in Education. https://library.apsce.net/index.php/ICCE/article/view/4002